Aerial view of a tanker's deck and helideck

Why it matters more in 2026

Manning agencies are the front door to your crew supply. They screen candidates, verify documents, process medicals, arrange travel and — in many fleets — hold the employment relationship. They are also where MLC exposure begins, because the convention prohibits charging seafarers fees for obtaining employment, and the shipowner is expected to be able to evidence compliance.

Most fleets audit their agencies less rigorously than they audit a paint supplier.

With a shortfall of 39,100 certificated officers and the top five supply countries providing 56.25% of the global workforce, agencies in those countries hold real leverage. Fleets that treat them as commodity suppliers get commodity candidates. Fleets that treat them as partners — and audit them properly — get first sight of the people they want.

The audit framework

Score each area 1–5. Anything scoring 2 or below is a corrective action with a date.

  1. Valid licence from the national authority, current and unrestricted
  2. Registered office and legal entity verified
  3. Insurance in place, including professional indemnity where required
  4. No adverse regulatory findings in the last three years
  5. Compliance with MLC recruitment and placement requirements documented

B. Fee practices (weight 20%)

  1. Written policy prohibiting fees charged to seafarers
  2. Evidence of that policy — seafarer receipts, interviews, complaint records
  3. Third-party costs (medicals, documents) clearly attributed and lawful
  4. Anonymous seafarer feedback channel available
  5. Sample seafarer interviews conducted during audit, out of management's hearing

Item 10 is the only one that produces reliable evidence. A policy document proves intent; a conversation with a seafarer proves practice.

C. Verification quality (weight 25%)

  1. Certificates verified with issuing administrations, not visually inspected
  2. Verification results recorded with date and source
  3. Flag endorsement requirements understood and checked
  4. Sea service verified against discharge books and company references
  5. Medical certificates from approved practitioners only
  6. Referencing process — who is called, what is asked, what is recorded

D. Recruitment quality (weight 20%)

  1. Sourcing channels and their productivity
  2. Screening process — technical assessment, English proficiency, behavioural interview
  3. Rejection rate and reasons, tracked
  4. Time-to-fill by rank
  5. Candidate no-show rate at joining
  6. Quality feedback loop from vessels back to the agency

E. Data and systems (weight 15%)

  1. Data protection compliance for seafarer personal data
  2. Structured data exchange with your crewing system, not email attachments
  3. No duplicate seafarer records created at the interface
  4. Document storage security and retention policy
  5. Business continuity — what happens if the agency's systems fail

F. Welfare and conduct (weight 10%)

  1. Pre-departure briefing content, including complaint routes
  2. Family contact process during the contract
  3. Handling of grievances raised through the agency
  4. Training on violence and harassment prevention, in line with the 2025 MLC amendments
  5. Support for repatriation and emergencies

Audit cadence

Agency tierCadenceMethod
Primary (>25% of a rank's supply)AnnualOn site, with seafarer interviews
SecondaryEvery 2 yearsOn site or hybrid
OccasionalEvery 3 yearsDesktop with evidence sampling
New agencyBefore first supplyFull on-site audit

Never rely solely on a desktop audit for a primary agency. The findings that matter — fee practices, verification shortcuts, screening depth — are not visible in submitted documents.

What to do with a poor result

  1. Written corrective action plan with dates and named owners
  2. Suspension of new supply until critical items are closed
  3. Re-audit within 90 days for critical findings
  4. Escalation to termination if fee-charging to seafarers is substantiated
  5. Notification to the flag state where a licensing breach is identified

Fee-charging should be treated as a zero-tolerance item. It is prohibited under MLC, it is exploitative, and it produces seafarers who join in debt — which is a safety issue as well as an ethical one.

Building the partnership side

Auditing is only half the relationship. Agencies that perform should get:

  • Multi-year supply commitments rather than transactional orders
  • Honest forecasts of demand by rank and month
  • Fast feedback on candidates, both positive and negative
  • Prompt payment of agency fees
  • Involvement in cadet programmes and progression planning

In a short market, being a preferred client of a good agency is worth more than squeezing its margin.

MLC, 2006 as amended, including amendments adopted June 2025; workforce and supply data from BIMCO/ICS 2026. Audit weightings are a suggested framework. Reviewed by the Zeaclub Editorial Team, 24 August 2026.

Frequently asked questions

Can a manning agency charge seafarers for finding them a job?

No. MLC 2006 prohibits charging seafarers fees or other charges for obtaining employment, other than certain limited costs such as statutory medical certificates and national documents.

Who is responsible if an agency supplies a fraudulent certificate?

The shipowner remains responsible for the ship being properly crewed. That is precisely why verification with issuing administrations, and auditing the agency's verification process, is not optional.

How many agencies should a fleet use?

Enough for resilience and geographic spread, few enough that each relationship is meaningful and auditable. Concentration in a single supply country is a risk in itself.

What is the single most useful audit technique?

Interviewing seafarers privately about what they paid and what they were told. Everything else can be prepared for.